New 2026 survey data shows many women view vaginal and sexual health as underserved by wellness brands. Learn what this means for your changing physical needs.
In September 2026, AlixPartners and Cosmetic Executive Women released a new proprietary report. The document is titled "The Extract: Beauty × Health × Wellness 2026." It examines the gap between consumer priorities and executive investment in the wellness market. A significant portion of the report focuses on how adults view the current availability of sexual health products.
The findings suggest that many consumers feel their intimate health needs remain largely unaddressed by major brands. This release brings renewed attention to the ongoing conversation about changing sexual wellbeing in adulthood. For adults aged 35 to 65, the intersection of physical health and wellness is a frequent topic of concern. The report provides a structured look at this exact tension in the modern retail environment.
Evaluating how wellness companies allocate their resources can help explain why certain products dominate store shelves. When consumers report feeling overlooked, it often reflects a broader hesitation within the industry to address mature physical needs. The data from this release offers a starting point for understanding these market dynamics. It also highlights the growing demand for clear, evidence-aware support.
Understanding these industry patterns is crucial for anyone navigating sexual longevity, midlife and aging. When the market fails to reflect the reality of mature consumers, adults are often left searching for answers on their own. This gap highlights the importance of reliable education. It reminds buyers to look beyond superficial marketing claims when managing their bodies.
As adults move through different life stages, their physical and emotional requirements naturally evolve. The wellness industry has historically struggled to meet these evolving needs with appropriate nuance and respect. This new survey provides a clear, numerical snapshot of that ongoing disconnect. It sets the stage for more honest conversations about what adults truly need from the market.
Understanding what this report can and cannot tell us requires a close look at its design. The AlixPartners and Cosmetic Executive Women survey was conducted online between May and June 2026. Researchers gathered responses from 1,000 United States consumers aged 18 and older. The consumer group was nearly evenly split, with men making up 49 percent and women making up 51 percent.
Alongside the consumer data, the report collected perspectives from 127 industry executives. These leaders work across the beauty, health, and wellness sectors. Including both groups allows the report to compare what buyers want with what companies are actually planning. This dual approach provides a clearer picture of potential misalignments in the market.
The online format of the survey allowed researchers to gather a wide range of viewpoints quickly. Because the consumer sample spanned adults from age 18 upward, the findings reflect a broad cross-section of the population. This broad scope helps researchers capture general sentiment across different generations. It ensures that the final data points are not restricted to a single demographic group.
Including industry executives provides a necessary counterweight to the consumer data. It shows exactly where business strategies diverge from what the public is actually asking for. For adults trying to find solutions for desire, libido and arousal, this divergence explains a lot of modern retail frustration. When executive priorities do not match consumer reality, the market inevitably falls short.
It is important to view these participant numbers through the right lens. The survey measures consumer and executive opinions, beliefs, and stated desires. It does not provide clinical measures of physical conditions or actual medical treatment availability. The results highlight how consumers feel about the market rather than measuring biological prevalence.
Readers should keep in mind that a survey of 1,000 people offers a snapshot of sentiment. It is not a comprehensive medical assessment or a substitute for clinical research. Questionnaires about market preferences are useful for tracking trends. However, they cannot confirm the physical presence of a medical condition or a biological deficiency.
The survey highlights specific areas where female respondents feel the market falls short. According to the release, 34 percent of surveyed women said low libido and sexual health were drastically underrepresented. They felt this underrepresentation was especially severe relative to executive investment. This indicates a strong consumer belief that companies are ignoring a vital aspect of physical wellbeing.
Furthermore, 37 percent of women respondents considered vaginal and intimate health to be underserved. These figures indicate a strong consumer desire for better support regarding intimate physical changes. Many women navigate these specific changes during midlife. The data suggests they are actively looking for reliable solutions that the market currently lacks.
The fact that over a third of surveyed women identified this gap is telling. It highlights a widespread feeling that intimate physical care is not receiving adequate corporate attention. For many adults, this lack of attention translates into a frustrating shopping experience. It can be difficult to find products that treat mature physical needs with dignity.
The AlixPartners newsroom release also presents a stark comparison regarding available medical treatments. The release states that there are 26 FDA-approved erectile-dysfunction medications for men. In contrast, it notes only two approved medications for women with low libido. This comparison underscores a perceived imbalance in how the medical and wellness industries approach male and female care.
The contrast between male and female medication options is frequently cited in discussions about healthcare equity. While the report does not detail the scientific or regulatory reasons for this discrepancy, the stark numbers capture attention. They serve as a powerful reminder of how differently the market addresses male and female intimate function. Understanding these hormones and sexual wellness discrepancies can help consumers advocate for better personal care.
Evaluating consumer surveys requires acknowledging clear limitations and boundaries. The terms "underserved" and "drastically underrepresented" reflect the personal perceptions of the respondents. They should not be interpreted as measured rates of disease or documented provider neglect. The survey captures feelings about the market, not a clinical audit of healthcare access.
Surveys based entirely on consumer sentiment are inherently subjective tools. They tell us how people feel about their options, but they do not measure the actual effectiveness of those options. A feeling of being underserved might stem from poor marketing rather than a true lack of effective products. It is crucial to separate emotional responses from objective biological realities.
The medication comparison included in the report also carries significant uncertainty. The public release does not explain the methodology behind the medication count. Because of this missing context, readers should view the comparison cautiously. It is a highlight from the report rather than a complete analysis of treatment availability.
The lack of detailed methodology for the medication comparison is a significant limitation. Creating medical treatments involves complex biological research, rigorous clinical trials, and strict safety regulations. Simply counting the number of approved medications does not tell the full story of scientific progress or medical difficulty. It is a useful talking point, but it is not a comprehensive medical review.
It is also important to remember that the report lacks several crucial data points. The public release does not provide detailed question wording, response weighting, or margins of error. We cannot determine exactly how many women answered these specific questions. We also do not know how the overall sample was structured to ensure fair representation.
Without these specific details, it is difficult to generalize the findings to the entire adult population. We cannot confirm how much money companies actually invested in menopause, libido, or sexual health products. The findings simply reflect perceived underinvestment and current consumer expectations. They do not prove that available products fail to meet established clinical standards.
These findings align with a broader shift in how adults view their physical and emotional care. The report operates on the premise that consumers increasingly see beauty, health, and wellness as connected priorities. Businesses, however, often continue to organize themselves around much narrower traditional categories. This structural divide can leave adults struggling to find comprehensive support when managing overlapping physical changes.
The disconnect between corporate structure and consumer reality is a common theme in modern wellness discussions. Adults rarely compartmentalize their physical, emotional, and intimate health into distinct categories. Instead, they experience these aspects of wellbeing as deeply interconnected parts of their daily lives. The relationships, intimacy and sexual connection they maintain rely on a holistic approach to physical care.
Industry leaders have offered their own interpretations of this growing divide. Lindy Firstenberg of AlixPartners noted that the average executive has yet to catch up. She pointed out changes in how consumers locate products, their budget priorities, and their interest in emerging tools. When companies fail to recognize these shifts, they miss opportunities to support adults navigating complex life stages.
Elana Drell Szyfer, the president of Cosmetic Executive Women, provided additional commentary on the market. She framed this dynamic as a "huge trust gap" between buyers and brands. She observed that consumers want quick results but remain highly skeptical of product marketing claims. This skepticism makes it harder for consumers to confidently select products for their private physical needs.
Szyfer's comments about the trust gap reflect a deep weariness among modern buyers. When products fail to deliver on exaggerated promises, consumers naturally become guarded and skeptical. This skepticism is a logical defense mechanism against an industry that frequently overpromises and underdelivers. Rebuilding this trust will require brands to prioritize transparency and evidence over flashy marketing.
Szyfer also emphasized that women want human support from someone who understands their specific age and life stage. This desire for informed, empathetic guidance is highly relevant for adults managing shifting libido and intimate physical changes. The need for trusted guidance frequently outpaces the simple availability of commercial retail products. Consumers want to feel understood, not just sold to.
For adults managing midlife health changes, this survey validates a common frustration. If you have felt that your concerns about physical desire or vaginal comfort are overlooked, these findings show you are not alone. The data offers a compelling reason to take your sexual wellbeing seriously. It also encourages you to confidently bring these topics into your regular health discussions.
Bringing these topics into your health discussions requires confidence and clear communication. You do not have to wait for the wellness market to catch up before seeking professional medical guidance. A knowledgeable doctor can offer advice tailored to your specific physical condition and medical history. This personalized approach is far more valuable than any generalized retail product.
However, acknowledging a gap in the market does not mean every available product is safe or effective. The desire for better options should not push anyone toward unproven consumer products or hasty medical decisions. Understanding your biological baseline remains the most important step before seeking out new treatments or wellness trends. A cautious approach helps you avoid spending money on items that lack solid scientific backing.
While the survey shows a demand for more products, it does not prescribe treatment for any individual. It also does not guarantee that one specific intervention will work for your unique biological situation. You should always discuss persistent physical symptoms with a qualified medical professional who understands your medical history. Clinical advice will always provide more reliable guidance than an online consumer trend report.
Recognizing the limits of consumer wellness products is essential for maintaining your sexual confidence. Do not allow a lack of retail options to convince you that your physical concerns are unimportant. By seeking out sexual wellness resources and guides, you can build a strong foundation of biological knowledge. This knowledge empowers you to make informed decisions about your body, regardless of what the market currently offers.
It is also helpful to distinguish between general wellness marketing and targeted medical care. The broad concerns raised by survey participants overlap significantly with the experiences of menopause, but they are not identical. A responsible approach requires separating general age-related changes from specific hormonal or medical conditions. By prioritizing objective biological context, you can navigate this complex market with greater confidence and clarity.
Navigating the evolving landscape of sexual wellness requires patience, clear information, and realistic expectations. As the market slowly adapts to consumer needs, staying informed helps you make decisions based on facts. Taking the time to understand your body is always more beneficial than simply following the latest industry trends. Prioritize open conversations with trusted professionals to support your long-term intimate wellbeing.
Relying on consumer wellness trends to address persistent physical changes can lead to unnecessary frustration and delayed medical care. Sexential addresses confusion about when a concern deserves professional medical input so you can confidently advocate for your physical needs. We are an evidence-aware sexual wellness and intimacy publication for adults aged 35 to 65. Our content explains sexual function, desire, and hormones in a calm, mature way without sensationalism or personalised medical advice. Explore Resources
Follow Sexential for thoughtful guidance on desire, sexual function, hormones, confidence, relationships and intimacy. Explore new articles and evidence-aware resources for sexual wellbeing across adulthood.
Australian researchers have identified bacterial persistence and partner reinfection as distinct pathways for recurrent bacterial vaginosis after joint treatment.
Consumer wellness data shows a shift from menopause terminology toward hormonal balance. We explain the difference between marketing language and clinical care.
The 2026 VA and DoD clinical practice guideline integrates therapies for genitourinary symptoms and sexual dysfunction into standard menopausal care.
Explore practical resources on desire, function, hormones, confidence, intimacy and sexual wellbeing.
Read the Blog
